A new industry body for animation.

Animation UK’s Oli Hyatt has called for declarations of interest in joining a proposed new industry body for animation.

In its eight years, Oli has acheived very real successes leading Animation UK, in particular the tax breaks for animation for television. But as he points out, it remains an informal organisation. There’s no official trad body for animation. And animation isn’t even officially counted as an industry at all, which makes it all but impossible to get its voice heard. As Lindsay Watson’s review of policy and children’s animated series has highlighted, “at policy level Britain’s animation industry is severely under represented.”

So, as Oli says, ‘it’s time to get serious about our industry. It’s time to invest and get the support and recognition we deserve.”

This isn’t news to AAUK, and it’s encouraging that whilst Animation UK’s focus has been on children’s television, the ambition is that the new organisation would address business, culture and skills in equal measure.

You can read Lindsay’s report on the Animation UK website here.

Oli has outlined his proposals in a letter here – and he’s asking for feedback and expressions of interest by 25 March 2016.

Arts Council England funding survey. Respond!

Arts Council England is asking arts organisations, artists and other stakeholders to feedback on their investment proposals for 2018-21, and suggested we might share this with you, so that animators’ views are represented. 

The proposals are here. They are generally quite broad, but seem reasonable, so it’s hard to think of much to say about them! Nevertheless, if we don’t say anything, our concerns won’t register.

So, we are strongly encouraging you to respond. You can say what you like, and as much or as little – you won’t be identified to ACE. Our Animation Alliance UK’s responses to the survey questions are below. Feel free to take any or all of this and use it yourself.

Here’s the link to the survey: http://surveys.comres.co.uk/wix/3/p1849093483.aspx


Animation Alliance UK responses:
CHANGES TO THE NATIONAL PORTFOLIO

This all seems sensible enough. We would simply note that animation isn’t represented in the current Portfolio, which seems at odds with all that ACE says about wanting to reach a wide public, young people, support digital creativity, etc, etc.

AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO FUNDING ARTS, MUSEUMS AND LIBRARIES
skipped this question

MORE SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUAL ARTISTS
Again, this seems reasonable, but animation is currently so under-represented across ACE’s investment that it’s difficult to know what benefit there might be to animators. As well as wanting to encourage ‘artists at an early stage of their careers’, ACE might also consider how it can encourage more representation of a broader range of creative practice and practitioner. This will necessitate a greater understanding of contemporary practice than ACE currently evidences, and, for animation in particular, clarity and consistency. Our members have often been given contradictory advice about ACE’s remit for animation, including being told that it simply doesn’t have one. One factor that acts as a barrier to early stage and established artists applying must surely the perception of ACE as being primarily interested in traditional and established forms.

CHANGES TO GRANTS FOR THE ARTS
Again, this seems reasonable. Animation is currently so under-represented in Grants for the arts that any change in ACE’s attitude might be beneficial. ‘Creative industry products’ needs elaborating. Animated documentary is a vital and expanding field of practice, but it is difficult to see why ACE would want to support arts documentaries without evidence that its current substantial investment in online arts programming has been successful. Museums are increasingly using animation and animators to creatively explore their collections and engage the public. And games and other innovative forms for digital platforms depend on animators’ creativity. So by and large, this all sounds promising. Again, this will necessitate a greater understanding of contemporary practice than ACE currently evidences, and, for animation in particular, a clarity and consistency. 

CHANGES TO STRATEGIC FUNDS
Independent animators don’t benefit from ACE’s current strategic funds and we don’t see that these proposals are likely to change that. 

Do you have any further comments…
It’s fair to say that many people, especially individual animators and artists, find Arts Council England a mysterious organisation, and get little sense that it understands us, or our creative practice. And so it’s difficult to understand how to respond to an organisation that seems to have little interest or understanding in what we do.

These are generally broad and sensible proposals. We would be disappointed if the consultation ended here. We would hope that there would be much more detailed, sector specific, targeted conversations, including with organisations that aren’t currently represented in ACE’s Portfolio, and with artists and practitioners making work that does not currently benefit from ACE funding generally. By which we mean animation and animators.

Letter to Arts Council England and BFI, July 2015

In July 2015, 23 animators, artists, programmers and producers – many of them members of AAUK – wrote to Darren Henley, CEO, Arts Council England and Amanda Nevill, CEO, British Film Institute, to draw their attention to the need for greater clarity around public policy and investment for independent animation, and asking them to urgently take steps to address these issues to help ensure British animation’s continued success.

You can read the letter and accompanying notes below. They responded with an invitation to a smaller group to meet with ACE and BFI in December 2015.

You can read the letter below, and notes of the meeting here.

15 July 2015

Dear Amanda Nevill and Darren Henley

We are some of Britain’s award winning animators, artists, producers and curators, working across and between ‘film’, ‘the arts’ and other creative industries. We are proud to have contributed to the growth, success and international renown of independent animation from the UK.

We are writing to draw your attention to the need for greater clarity around public policy and investment for independent animation. We ask that you urgently take steps to address these issues to help ensure British animation’s continued success.

We welcome the initiatives that have been introduced since 2011: the tax credits to support children’s television animation; the BFI Aardman Development Lab; the Vision Awards for animation studios; and the BFI Film Fund development support for animation features. However, our concern is at the lack of support for other forms of animation: for experiment, innovation and creative risk.

The UK’s international reputation for nurturing original and creative animation talent was achieved in the 1990s and came by way of a uniquely British model of consistent public support from public service broadcasters and from public film and arts funding bodies that facilitated creative production. Today, there is no dedicated funding for animation in England and the detrimental impact of that is startlingly evidenced, not least, in the diminished UK representation at the Oscars and international film festivals (please see our notes, below).

British animators have continued to make films, and the success of student work, studio and self-funded films – at the BAFTAs, Oscars, and international festivals – is testament to both the quality and determination of British artistic talent. But without public investment, other talent is not developed and is going to waste, or going elsewhere. The absence of public support means that the only people who can make animation are students, the few directors supported by the studios that represent them, and those with independent means. The art form cannot be expected to be wholly reliant on its practitioners’ resourcefulness: this is inequitable, unsustainable, and fails to promote diversity.

Why independent animation matters
Animation is a vital part of the UK’s culture and its creative industries; is has a public value that is intrinsic and instrumental, economic and cultural. Animation is the predominant digital visual form, inherently cross-platform, and an core component of digital form and culture. The Arts Council England funded Accelerate Animation Report (2013) notes how “digital technology and the explosion of screen-based culture mean that we all encounter animation in different forms many times a day.”

Animators make a fundamental contribution to much live action production. Animation is prevalent in contemporary visual arts practice; it is an increasingly integral component of theatre, opera and dance productions. The UK’s reputation as a centre for creativity in animation attracts international students to our animation schools.

Animation is a site of innovation, risk-taking and the development of new creative techniques that extend the potential of technologies. The UK’s reputation for creativity and innovation creates demand for animation talent; independent production is a test bed for advertising, video gaming and other creative industries, and for filmmakers and writers who go on to make feature length films and television series. Chris Robinson, artistic director of Ottawa International Animation Festival has noted how “almost all of the most successful and original industry animation voices came from independent backgrounds. It was their unique, experimental styles and voices that made them stand out.”

Contemporary practice and ways of working
The Warwick Commission’s report, Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth, noted that “the points of connection between the Cultural and Creative Industries are where the potential for greatest value creation resides – culturally, socially and economically” and that “insufficient attention has been paid to the synergies between the interlocking sectors of the Cultural and Creative Industries Ecosystem. There is already a flow of talent, ideas, and public and private investment across and between the Cultural and Creative Industries.”

The Accelerate Animation Report amply evidences how animation practice sits at the nexus of this interchange. The Warwick Commission’s recommendation that “this flow needs to now be better identified and encouraged” and the warning that “not enough is being done to stimulate or realise the creative potential of individuals, or to maximise their cultural and economic value to society” could not apply more strongly, and critically, than they do to animation.

Arts Council England has declared its commitment to animation: most recently, in November 2013, then Chief Executive, Alan Davey, said that ACE and BFI would work together “to further support animators in both development, production, networking and knowledge sharing in 2014/15′′. We believe there is no time to lose in acting on these intentions. The sums of money required to underpin a vibrant independent animation sector are relatively very small indeed, especially in relation to the potential cultural and reputational returns on any investment.

Our hope is that you will appreciate our concerns and be open to further conversation with us on how independent animation can best be supported, and as a first step, we hope you might consider a meeting.

Yours sincerely

Will Anderson, BAFTA winner
Kieran Argo, Encounters Short Film and Animation Festival
Paul Bush, animator, awards include Tampere, Hiroshima, Zagreb, Melbourne
Emma Calder, animator
 and artist, Pearly Oyster Productions. Awards include Bradford, Zagreb, Chicago, Dresden, Cinanima
Sarah Cox, BAFTA winner
Gaelle Denis, BAFTA winner
Keith Griffiths, producer, BAFTA nominee, Cannes Palme d’Or nominee and winner
Jonathan Hodgson, BAFTA winner
Phil Mulloy, animator, three time Best Feature award winner at Ottawa International Animation Festival
Ian Francis, Flatpack Festival
Iain Gardner, animator, animation programmer Edinburgh International Film Festival
Karolina Glusiec, winner Jerwood Prize for Drawing
Stephen Irwin, animator, awards include Grand Prize Ottawa International Animation Festival
Ruth Lingford, animator, Professor of Animation at Harvard, McLaren Award winner
Maria Manton, producer, BAFTA nominee
Mikey Please, BAFTA winner, awards include Annecy, BAA, Los Angeles, AFI, Clermont Ferrand, SXSW
Sally Pearce, animator
Timothy and Stephen Quay, animators, BAFTA nominees, Cannes Palme d’Or nominees
Chris Shepherd, animator, BAFTA nominee, awards include Rotterdam, AFI, LFF, Fantoche, BAA, Ann Arbor
David Shrigley, artist
Gary Thomas and Abigail Addison, Animate Projects

 

Notes on UK Animation

In the 1990s:

  • BBC and S4C have dedicated animation units
  • Channel 4 supports around 15 short films a year through its innovative open call schemes, in 
partnerships with the BFI, the Arts Council of Great Britain/England and the National Media 
Museum, as well as single films
  • Between 1995 and 2000, National Lottery funding for film supports animated shorts and artists’ 
animation with grants of up to £50,000 Now:
  • No dedicated funding for animated shorts in England
  • Creative England’s iShorts is effectively off limits to animators, as was the BFI’s Shorts scheme
  • ACE support for animation through Channel 4’s Random Acts now supports training of/production by 
young people, and the availability of slots for professional animators/producers and other filmmakers is as a consequence substantially reduced

Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film

1990   Nick Park wins with Creature Comforts
1991   Daniel Greaves wins for Manipulation
1992   3 of the 5 Oscar nominees are British
1993   4 of the 5 Oscar nominees are British
2000   Michael Dudok de Witt’s Lottery funded Father and Daughter wins

In the ten years from 1992 to 2001, there were 19 Oscar nominations for British films. There have been only nine nominations 13 years since, including two children’s television specials, Nick Park’s A Matter of Loaf and Death (made for the BBC), three NFTS graduation films, and three independent productions with no UK public investment.

BAFTA Award for Best Short Animation

Since 2007:

  • 21 British UK independent nominated
  • 12 were student films
  • only 3 had any public investment 

British representation at international festivals

Stuttgart Animation Festival           1998: 13 films          2011: 1 film
Hiroshima Animation Festival         1998: 18 films          2011: 4 films
Annecy (competition)                     1998:   8 films          2011: 2 films

Despite the lack of public investment, British animators have continued to make films and find success. In 2011, at Ottawa International Animation Festival – the biggest of its kind in North America – animators from the UK took seven of 15 international prizes, including those for best short (Stephen Irwin) and best feature (Phil Mulloy). At Sundance in 2012, five out of seven in the international Animated Short category were British, and another two British animations were selected for the International Narrative Short category, with Kibwe Tavares’ Robots of Brixton winning the Special Jury Award for Animation Direction.